When you are buying a home, you are trying to purchase a home that is the most expensive one in the neighborhood. The goal is to make it look and feel the most expensive possible. This usually means more than simply putting more money into the house. It means getting a home that will be a home. The most important things are that it is a place to live, that it has the right size and location, that it has the right amenities, and that it is a home.
What makes a home a home? How much money do you have to put into a home to make it look the most expensive it can possibly look? This can be quite a challenge. At our office we have multiple homes in different price ranges. We’ve always thought the “dream home” is the one with the most money put into it, the one that will look the most extravagant and extravagant. Then we get to think about how we can afford to put more money into the home.
This is the point where I think about the difference between aspirational capital and wealth. Wealth is something you can have, like a lot of cars, or lots of expensive clothes, or a large amount of money. It can be hard to put into real life, because you don’t know if you can ever have those things again. The things you have are often hard to keep. At our office we have more of a mix of aspirational capital and wealth.
Of course we want aspirational capital because we want to be able to travel to exotic places, and we want to have the things our kids and grandkids will never get to have, like expensive cars and clothes and houses. But for us it’s a hard thing to get. I think that aspirational capital is easier to put into reality. That’s because of how aspirational capital is created.
It’s the stuff that fills our pockets. Like gold and silver and diamonds, aspirational capital is something tangible. It is something tangible and it is something tangible. Because like all of the above, aspirational capital is something tangible. It is something tangible and it is something tangible.
Its what we have to invest money in. The money we spend on clothes and cars and houses. But with aspirational capital, if you look at all of the things that you invest your money in, its not just the things that you spend your money on. But all of the things that you invest your money in, the more aspirational capital you invest in, the more aspirational capital you have.
For example, a person with five thousand dollars in aspirational capital would buy a house with five thousand dollars in aspirational capital. The person with one thousand dollars in aspirational capital would buy a home with one thousand dollars in aspirational capital. A person with ten thousand dollars in aspirational capital would buy a home with ten thousand dollars in aspirational capital. Which is more aspirational capital? The more aspirational capital a person has, the more aspirational capital he or she has.
I think we can agree that aspirational capital is more aspirational. If you are aspirational to own a house with $500,000 in aspirational capital, then you’d probably buy a house with $500,000 in aspirational capital. If you are aspirational to be a CEO with $1 million in aspirational capital, you would probably buy a house with $1 million in aspirational capital.
The definition of aspirational capital is “the sum of all possible things that could have been; the sum of the possible things that could have been.” This is the opposite of “the sum of all things that could have been; the sum of what could have been.” In other words, aspirational capital only refers to the sum of all things that could have been, not the sum of the things that actually were.
Because the definition of aspirational capital is the sum of all possibilities, the aspirational capital metric is a measure of how large a pie you are throwing into a pie. Aspirational capital is the sum of all the things that could have been possible in the present moment, including the possible that might have been. It’s a measure of how much of the present moment you’re willing to invest in the present moment.
